8

Apr

Congress Manifesto A Mixed Bag, Indicates A Cautious Approach

image

Today’s Edition

New Delhi, 8 April 2024

Prof. Shivaji Sarkar

A person wearing glasses and a suit Description automatically generated

The Congress has come out with a manifesto that looks pompous and well-intentioned but less original and more reactive to the present policies. The party is cautious even as it says it may replace NEP but is subdued on the proposed novel path to deal with the sliding economy, eloquently silent on PSUs and unnecessary 4-year-BA degree modelled on the highly expensive US model.

It notes overall dissatisfaction over NEP but limits it to “will revisit and amend the New Education Policy (NEP) after consulting with the state governments”. Does it mean the 4-year degree course to continue? Its scrapping could have highlighted deep concerns to instil confidence in the youth, each of whom would spend at least Rs 3 lakh a year extra and be delayed for the job market. Overall, from an unheard-of four-year nursery – to a new four-year degree – a child loses four years during education. Congress could have highlighted the unnecessary fourth year at the degree level to cost two crore aspirants an additional expenditure of Rs 6 lakh crore a year. If four years lost over the period are calculated in financial and social terms it’s unfathomable. 

Article At a Glance

The Indian National Congress has released a manifesto that, while well-intentioned, lacks originality and is reactive to current policies.

 The party is cautious in its approach on the New Education Policy (NEP) and the Goods and Services Tax (GST), but is silent on issues such as Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and the proposed four-year Bachelor of Arts degree.

The manifesto highlights dissatisfaction with the NEP but does not provide a clear alternative, and is evasive on labor laws and corruption. The party promises to probe controversial issues such as demonetization and the Rafale deal, but past experience suggests that such promises may not be fulfilled.

The manifesto also lacks a clear plan for job creation and economic growth, and does not address issues such as high petrol prices and toll collections. However, the party's promise to review the Telecommunications Act and remove provisions that restrict freedom of speech and expression is a positive step. Overall, the manifesto is a mixed bag, with some promising proposals but also some notable omissions.

It avoids a word on PSUs. The Nav Sankalp Economic Policy resets the button with “3-W”s  - work, wealth and welfare for reviewing GST - the hope of most small traders, promoting manufacturing and making jobs the cornerstone, rejecting jobless growth.  A new orientation since 1991. Its definition of work is the same as in the present - self-employment and starting a business.

It highlights that RBI finds 60 per cent of central projects stalled causing a cost escalation of Rs 5 lakh crore. It could have said these would be scrapped. On labour laws too the party is evasive on undoing the amendments denying them the rights.

On corruption, it says, “will probe demonetisation, Rafale deal, Pegasus spyware, the Electoral Bonds scheme and bring to law those who made illegal gains through these measures”.  Rahul Gandhi at the launch said electoral bonds showed that political funding to the BJP was through “extortion and putting “pressure” on the corporates. Welcome move. It has also promised a reversal of Agnipath army recruitment. In most such opposition promises, it was observed that once in government, the issues are shelved and some may even say these were “jumlas” as manifestos have turned out. Some probes have been mere witch-hunting. In December 2013, the GST was stalled terming it anti-people but once in power, those who stalled hurriedly enacted it at the world’s highest rates.

The party is forthright in highlighting the abysmal Manipur situation, a silver lining.

The 1971 Congress manifesto is remembered to the day for its classic “Garibi Hatao” slogan. The slogan five “Nyaya”, may be a good idea but is not inspiring. It calls for five pillars of justice– Justice for Youth, Justice for Women’, Justice for Farmers, Justice for Workers, and Justice for Shareholders. What is so great about it, is if it has to counter mumkin hai! The convenor P Chidambaram has criticised government performances in his newspaper columns and even challenged the new statistics. It is not reflected in his document. It even does not question the figures of the 3-trillion economy which has a high repayment of Rs 10 lakh crore and reduces Rs 47 lakh crore 2024-25 budget to Rs 37 lakh crore. The 7 per cent growth figures are being questioned by the World Bank.

The communication could have been sharper. It could have highlighted the weaker consumer sentiments than five years back as RBI’s Consumer Confidence Survey denotes. In 2024, fewer people report improvement in the employment of income situation.

The middle class is promised a stable income tax. It does not promise that it would be at 22 per cent corporate taxes.

To combat unemployment, Congress has guaranteed a one-year apprenticeship with a private or a public sector company to every diploma holder or college graduate below the age of 25 years. The wages of workers under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act will also be increased to Rs 400 per day – the minimum national wage it announces. It seems to have forgotten that the apprenticeship scheme was introduced by Indira Gandhi in the 1970s.  Repeated several times. Each time it was a cropper as the private sector never liked it and PSUs were lukewarm. 

Railways are on the path of Air India disaster with dynamic fare aimed at boosting air travel. All metros in the country except Kolkata are running in losses. Manifesto could have harped on it and suggested pocket and eco-friendly solutions like inexpensive elevated trams replacing money guzzlers. 

Caste-based census could help it politically to an extent but that cannot be a road map for creating jobs. It has fallen into the trap of caste politics.

It has spoken of high petrol prices, and questioned “cess” raj but is silent on the atrociously high petrol road cess toll of Rs 32.9 per litre introduced promising to abolish toll gates. The country needs freedom from extortionist toll collections of over Rs 10 lakh crore through cess and toll gates causing high inflation.

Similarly, it is silent on scrapping illicit laws for car/tractor junking and high education fees. These cause enormous wealth loss to farmers and average families. With a bit of empathy, it could have touched millions of hearts. It is a whale of political opportunity to cater to the people.

It has done well to promise that job applications would not have any fee. The call for opening more Kendriya Vidyalayas, Navodaya Vidyalayas and Kasturba Gandhi Girls schools are reassuring.

The move to introduce free education up to class ten is appropriate. Would it be so also in private public schools? It has a model in UP. In the 1960s, the Congress government introduced the system of paying teachers’ salaries even for private schools ushering in required changes in the education scenario. That brings the fundamental difference. 

It has decided to review the Telecommunications Act, of 2023 and remove the provisions that restrict freedom of speech and expression that violate the right to privacy. It ignores the more draconian Bharat Samhita or other amendments to the Indian Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code. The powers to misuse ED, CBI and other bodies emanate from it.

Still, the promise to have a fearless society may raise hopes. The nation aspires that with these new moves, the political discourse will turn for the better.

  • Share:

About Us

We must explain to you how all seds this mistakens idea off denouncing pleasures and praising pain was born and I will give you a completed accounts..

Contact Us

Contact Info

  • 70, Gyan Khand- 4, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad. Uttar Pradesh.
  • +91-9810533682
  • info@mediamap.co.in
  • Week Days: 09.00 to 18.00 Sunday: Closed